Monday, March 28, 2022

A Few Thoughts on Last Night's Oscars and What Strength Looks Like

 



So last night was pretty wild.

If you didn’t see it live, you’ve heard about it by now. Comedian Chris Rock, onstage at the Oscars to present the award for Best Documentary Feature, made a joke at Jada Pinkett-Smith’s expense, saying he couldn’t wait to see her star in G.I. Jane 2, a reference to the actress’s shaved head. Her husband, Best Actor nominee (now winner) Will Smith laughed along with the crowd initially, but Jada did not, and after seeing his wife’s expression, Will took action. Striding onstage, Smith marched up to Rock, slapped him across the face with an open hand, returned to his seat, and twice bellowed at Rock to “keep my wife’s name out your ****ing mouth.” A jarred Rock finished the award presentation and the show went on.

Watching live, it wasn’t totally clear at first what we’d just seen, in part because ABC bleeped more than thirty seconds of the audio due to Smith’s cursing. The audience, both in the theater and watching on television, seemed uncertain whether they’d just watched a staged bit or whether it was what it looked like. But as information started to trickle in from the theater and online, it became clear that it was exactly what it looked like: in Rock’s own words, “Will Smith just smacked the **** out of me.”

It was a surreal thing to watch live. And I’m not going to lie, it was incredibly entertaining television, especially when everyone collectively realized Smith would likely be back onstage making an acceptance speech before the end of the night. But it was also ugly—and perhaps indicative of some bigger problems we see in our own, non-Hollywood lives.

Let’s start with Chris Rock and the joke he made. Smith defenders were quick to add context to his and his wife’s outrage—Pinkett-Smith made public last year that she suffers from severe alopecia, so her shaved head is the result of a medical condition, not a fashion choice. Rock’s joke, Smith fans cried, was a low blow, an undignified cheap shot on what should be a celebratory night.

Sure, Rock’s defenders replied, but Chris Rock is a professional comedian. His job is to make jokes, often at people’s expense. And Oscar presenters have been making roast-style cracks at the expense of movie stars since the days of Bob Hope. Whether Rock knew about Pinkett-Smith’s condition or not, it was certainly no excuse for Smith’s behavior. It was just a joke.

Wherever you fall, this much is true: Chris Rock made a mean-spirited joke about a colleague’s appearance. And things escalated from there.

Which brings us to Will Smith. His defenders and his attackers alike have been speculating ever since the slap about the state of his marriage to Jada Pinkett-Smith. Through a variety of interviews and talk show appearances, the two Smiths have made clear that their marriage is not traditionally monogamous and that neither has been entirely faithful to the other. What’s more, Smith grew up in an abusive home where he witnessed his father hit his mother and felt powerless to stop it. Oh, and for what it’s worth, Smith was preparing for the biggest moment of his professional life, the culmination of decades in show business. So there was a lot of emotional baggage, a swirling mixture of pride and shame and ego, that carried into his decision to leave his seat and take matters into his own hands.

But whatever his motivation, Smith chose violence. Instead of letting it go, instead of waiting until after the show to talk to Rock, instead of consoling Jada, Smith chose to publicly assault and scream at the man who’d mocked his wife.

And then, upon winning the Oscar for Best Actor and being given a platform to say whatever he wanted in front of millions, Smith abandoned whatever speech he’d prepared and spent six minutes verbally processing what he’d done. He apologized to the Academy and the audience—but not, crucially, Chris Rock—and rationalized what he’d done as “defending his family.” What comes next, only time will tell.

So let’s talk for a second about Chris Rock and Will Smith, two men who have reached heights of fame and fortune that most of us can only imagine, yet who—in entirely different ways—showed just how fragile modern masculinity can be.

Rock showed us what petty, mean masculinity looks like. The kind that makes snide cracks at other people’s expense and, when called on it, puts its hands up and says, “Geez, can’t you take a joke?” The kind that finds value in cheap laughs instead of hard-won respect. The kind that lifts itself up by tearing others down.

Smith showed an even uglier, more dangerous version of masculinity. The kind that responds to not getting its way with a tantrum and without regard for the setting. The kind that escalates conflicts from verbal to physical. The kind that sees violence as an outlet and a solution at the same time, responding to emotional distress with physical aggression. The kind of caveman masculinity that says I will beat you into submission. The kind that refuses to apologize because it can’t abide the thought that it’s done wrong.

Both versions of masculinity—the cynical, snide, petty troll and the self-righteous, angry, violent narcissist—are tremendously prevalent these days. So many men, confused and threatened by the rapidly changing world around them, are responding by lashing out. So many men, obsessed with the appearance of control, are trying to show their strength by inflicting it on others. Whether with jokes or with fists, so many men are trying to heal themselves by hurting others.

But at the end of the Oscar ceremony, we were shown a different kind of strength, courtesy of the final presenter, pop star and Oscar winner Lady Gaga. She came onstage with show biz legend Liza Minelli, who is clearly ailing at age 76. Minelli was in a wheelchair, fumbled her lines, and seemed confused and flustered by all that was happening around her, laughing more than she spoke. Gaga, after graciously introducing Minelli, gave her the spotlight only for it to become apparent that Minelli might not be able to handle it. In a masterclass of helping without condescending, Gaga allowed Minelli to reach the end of her thought before stepping in to finish the presentation. Then, in a moment captured by a hot mic, she leaned over and softly told Minelli, “I've got you.” A grateful Minelli whispered back, “I know, thank you!”

That is strength. Lifting others up with kindness instead of raising yourself up at their expense. Responding to chaos with kindness and grace instead of bitterness and aggression. Being a servant instead of a star.

I wouldn’t have guessed I’d learn so much about masculinity from the Oscars. I wouldn’t have guessed that an awards show would become such a parable about strength. I wouldn’t have guessed that the strongest person onstage would be Lady Gaga.

But then again, I wouldn’t have guessed that the Almighty would become a baby, that the Alpha and Omega would wash feet, that the King of Kings would become a Suffering Servant. I never would have imagined that the Creator of the universe would save the world as a Crucified Christ.

Strength looks so much different than men like me think it does. We still have so much to learn.

Friday, March 25, 2022

Walking Together (Friday Devotional)

 

For you are still of the flesh. For as long as there is jealousy and quarreling among you, are you not of the flesh, and behaving according to human inclinations? For when one says, “I belong to Paul,” and another, “I belong to Apollos,” are you not merely human? What then is Apollos? What is Paul? Servants through whom you came to believe, as the Lord assigned to each. I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth. So neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but only God who gives the growth. The one who plants and the one who waters have a common purpose, and each will receive wages according to the labor of each. For we are God’s servants, working together; you are God’s field, God’s building.

- 1 Corinthians 3:3-9

In 19th century Britain, one of the hottest fads was a sport called pedestrianism: competitive walking. Huge crowds would gather at tracks otherwise used for horse racing and watch as a dozen or so men would line up at the starting blocks to, well, walk around in circles. Races could go on for days as the various competitors put one foot in front of the other in a test of endurance.

In 2022, the concept of competitive walking seems bizarre to us. Yet too often believers, from the earliest days of the church until today, make their walk with Christ into a competition, seeking to see whether they can “outwalk” their brothers and sisters in faith.

In the Corinthian church, believers divided themselves up according to which apostle they identified with: “I belong to Paul,” one would say; “I belong to Apollos” the other would respond. Today our splits usually fall along other lines: personal preferences, political differences, and even simple clashes of personality. Whatever the case, we are eager to show that our faith is more sincere and more effective than someone else’s.

Paul makes clear that these comparisons are harmful, not helpful. Ultimately, he reminds us, it is God who empowers us to do His will; it is God who brings about spiritual growth. Our task is not to pit ourselves against each other, but to work together on His behalf.

Competitive walking died out in the early 20th century, replaced by more exciting forms of recreation, and it seems long past time that its spiritual parallel do the same. In a world where there’s plenty of polarization already, may God’s people trade quarrels for compassion and division for devotion—because nobody wants to watch people trying to outwalk each other.

Friday, March 18, 2022

Part of the Team (Friday Devotional)

 

Just then some men came, carrying a paralyzed man on a bed. They were trying to bring him in and lay him before Jesus; but finding no way to bring him in because of the crowd, they went up on the roof and let him down with his bed through the tiles into the middle of the crowd in front of Jesus.

- Luke 5:18-19

One of the things I appreciate most about baseball is how one player cannot make all the difference between winning and losing. In basketball, LeBron James can singlehandedly turn a mediocre franchise into a title contender. In football, we saw how adding Tom Brady transformed the Tampa Bay Buccaneers from a middling team into a Super Bowl champion in one season. Yet in baseball, Mike Trout—baseball’s best player for 10 years—has never won a playoff game. Despite all his individual heroics, he needs his teammates to succeed.

When we think about faith in Christ, we often regard it as an individual pursuit. We emphasize how your decision to follow God is not one anybody else can make for you, we talk about your “personal relationship with Jesus,” and in moments of confession and reflection, we talk about how this is “just between you and the Lord.” Seen through the American lens of rugged individualism, faith becomes a solo endeavor, a sport where one star—you—makes all the difference.

But the Bible tells a different story, one in which your faith is shaped by a community of brothers and sisters. Jesus didn’t call one outstanding apprentice, but 12 flawed disciples. Jesus didn’t pass the gospel on to his right hand man, but to a body of believers. And time and time again, from Jairus’s daughter to the centurion’s servant to the paralyzed man in the verses above, we see people coming to Jesus as advocates, begging him to help those they love the most. Sometimes, as U2 so memorably put it, you can’t make it on your own.

In a culture that prizes individual achievement, there is a never-ending temptation to think that Christian community is optional, that the church is a crutch to lean on or a luxury to opt out of rather than a family you belong to. But Scripture is clear that worship, evangelism, service, and fellowship—the fundamental activities of the believer—are things we do together, not things you do alone. There are no indispensable superstars in the church, only teammates—and we need each other to succeed.


Friday, March 11, 2022

Ink Stained (Friday Devotional)

 

If you know these things, you are blessed if you do them.

- John 13:17

Early Tuesday morning, you may remember, it was cold—lately Texas can’t seem to decide from day to day whether it’s winter or spring, but Tuesday was assuredly a wintery day. And in my house, where everyone but me was still snuggled under their covers, the thermostat was down to a chilly 62 degrees. So as I sat in my chair in the living room, I was using the tools at my disposal to warm up—a blanket on my lap, socks on my feet, a hoodie over the T-shirt I’d slept in. And lastly, I tightly gripped my piping hot coffee cup, wrapping my hand all the way around the cup instead of holding it by the curved handle.

But when, my hands sufficiently warmed, I put the cup down, I was surprised by what I saw: black ink all over my fingers. Some combination of the cheapness of the mug, the heat of the liquid inside, and my grip meant that some of the cup’s ink had rubbed off on my hand. I’d been holding onto it so tightly that it rubbed off on me.

God gave us the Bible so that exactly that would happen—not so that we’d have a nice family heirloom or a dusty paperweight, but so that we would hold on to it so tightly its words would start to rub off on us. God’s commands are intended to be read and studied, but more than anything they are meant to be obeyed—the point of Scripture is not just to know it, but to live it.

The Bible is honored and treasured by many people around the world, heralded for its literary and historical value and the wisdom within its pages. But if its only value to you is intellectual, if you read the Bible only to learn things but never to apply them, then you’ve missed the point. God gave us his Word so that we would hear it and then be changed by the hearing. So read it well, hold it tightly—and by the power of the Holy Spirit, let it rub off on you.

Friday, March 4, 2022

February Reading Log

 

Plenty of reading this past month, from a lot of different corners of the literary world. Take a look!

3 Articles I Like This Month

"The Dissenters Trying to Save Evangelicalism from Itself" by David Brooks, The New York Times. 19 minutes.

A profile of the evangelical thought leaders—people like Beth Moore, David French, Russell Moore, Kristen Kobes Du Mez, and otherswho have split from their institutions since the Trump presidency and are now doing their best to reflect upon what it really means to be an evangelical Christian and determine whether the movement can be redeemed.

"MLB’s Owners Had Every Advantage, and Still It Wasn’t Enough for Them" by Ken Rosenthal, The Athletic. 6 minutes.

With any labor dispute, there is a tendency to cast blame on both sides, to assume they are equally at fault for not reaching a deal. But as Ken Rosenthal, arguably baseball's most respected reporter, makes clear in this article, that is not the case with the current MLB lockout. If you want to know who to blame, it's not the players—it's the 30 billionaire owners who, having routed the Players Association in the last round of collective bargaining, decided they'd rather cancel games than lose a single advantage they'd gained.

"Does My Son Know You?" by Jonathan Tjarks, The Ringer. 11 minutes.

The writer, who is facing terminal illness, offers his thoughts on the importance of fatherhood, friendship, and what he wants to leave behind for his son. A guaranteed tearjerker.

Reading Through the Fantastic Four- #251-270, Annual #17

This run of issues begins with an ambitious 6-issue quest through the Negative Zone, where writer-artist John Byrne presents six single-issue stories about the FF encountering various alien beings, borrowing elements from classic stories ranging from Lawrence of Arabia to Star Wars. While the attempt to expand upon the mythos of the Negative Zone is admirable, this story is, to my mind, the rare misfire in the Byrne run; rather than adding anything to readers' conception of this part of FF lore, it demystifies something that had once been a playground for wild ideas.

Thankfully, when the FF return to earth, Byrne follows it up with two classic stories: one in which Doctor Doom imbues Galactus' former herald, Terrax, to battle the foursome, and another in which Reed Richards is put on trial by various galactic races for the crime of saving Galactus' life in a previous Byrne issue. These issues are Byrne at his best, borrowing the best of the Silver Age and then putting his own modern spin on it, offering thoughtful and imaginative stories that leave the reader in awe.

After all that cosmic grandeur, this run of issues ends with a much more grounded, emotional story. Sue Richards, having learned she is pregnant with her and Reed's second child, experiences complications with her pregnancy, much like she did before their son Franklin was born, and Reed enlists some of the best minds in the world to try and save her and the baby. Ultimately, he determines that the only man who can help her is the criminal Doctor Octopus, and convinces him to set his villainy aside and help Sue. But, in a devastating final page, Reed learns they've arrived too late: Sue has suffered a miscarriage.

All in all, this run of 20 issues contains some of John Byrne's most influential stories ("The Trial of Reed Richards" has a strong argument for being the best issue of his entire run), even as some tales are better than others. Here you see a writer and artist at the peak of his powers, reviving a title that had gotten stale in the 1970s and making it his own. Looking forward to finishing his legendary run in March!

WHOLEHEARTED FAITH by Rachel Held Evans with Jeff Chu

In the "ex-vangelical" community (those who have left evangelicalism for mainline denominations or, in rare cases, left the faith altogether), Rachel Held Evans has become something of a saint, especially since her tragic, unexpected death in 2019. During her life, Rachel (I'm abandoning my normal journalistic policy of referring to authors by their last names; for fans of Rachel Held Evans, she was always just "Rachel") was at the forefront of what is popularly known now as "deconstruction." She spent years deeply examining the evangelical subculture she grew up in and found it wanting—even as she found Jesus more captivating than ever. Indeed, what set Rachel apart from all the other exvangelicals (many of whom I greatly admire) was that her anger at evangelicalism's flaws never overwhelmed her love for Jesus—even when institutional Christianity seemed a lost cause, she never stopped believing the gospel of Jesus Christ was good news.

Wholehearted Faith, a posthumous patchwork of her writings lovingly stitched together by friend and editor Jeff Chu, continues the journey of reflection, deconstruction, and rebuilding begun by her previous works, Searching for Sunday and Inspired. But where those books often focused on what she used to believe, this book is more forward-looking, reckoning with her evangelical background but not dwelling upon it. Wholehearted Faith is less about breaking down an old belief system than about asking questions, occasionally finding answers, and more frequently finding rest in the mystery of God.

In other words, Wholehearted Faith finds Rachel more at peace than she was in her previous books, no longer grief-stricken at the state of an evangelicalism she was desperately trying to hold onto, but instead divorced from it and content to simply be in Christ. It sees her finding refuge in God's love when the world seems out of control, in the community of faith when she feels most alone. It is, as Rachel always was, profoundly meaningful, searching, and honest.

For conservative evangelicals, I highly recommend reading some of Rachel's work for the piercing yet kind ways she brings to light weaknesses you may never have considered. For moderate and progressive Christians, I recommend her writing for the balance it strikes between fearless prophetic critique and gentle wisdom. And for unbelievers, I recommend reading Rachel because she was a living example of what the old hymn promised, in paraphrase of Jesus: "they'll know we are Christians by our love." Read Wholehearted Faith and be blessed.


GENTLE AND LOWLY: THE  HEART OF CHRIST FOR SINNERS AND SUFFERERS by Dane Ortlund

To many, God is perceived as a stern taskmaster, a no-nonsense judge who is just waiting for you to mess up. But in Christ, we see the heart of God: as Jesus says in Matthew 11:29, he is "gentle and lowly in heart."

Gentle and Lowly, regarded by many as a modern devotional classic, plumbs the depths of Scripture and the writings of Puritans like Thomas Goodwin to describe the heart of God, how his intolerance for sin never overrides his love for sinners. Over the course of 23 chapters, author Dane Ortlund touches on God's mercy from every conceivable angle in a way that feels focused without being redundant.

Ortlund's Reformed views are on full display—the only outside scholars he references are, by design, Puritans—but they never distract from his central theme, one which can be embraced by Calvinists and Arminians, Protestants and Catholics, evangelicals and mainliners alike. God loves us—it's as simple as that. 


MACBETH by William Shakespeare

One long-term reading goal of mine is to make my way through the complete works of Shakespeare, and with the arrival of Joel Cohen's The Tragedy of Macbeth on Apple TV+, Macbeth seemed a good place to start. While we read several of Shakespeare's plays in school, this was one of the more notable omissions, and I was both excited and apprehensive to dive in.

Macbeth, for those unfamiliar with it, is a play about the peril of unchecked ambition, the power of guilt, and the vagaries of destiny. It tells the story of the Scottish lord Macbeth who, compelled by a premonition, the urging of his wife, and his own ego, murders the king of Scotland and becomes king himself. Having committed this act, he finds himself plagued by paranoia and shame, ultimately descending into tyranny and meeting his own bloody end.

It's a play which, like all of Shakespeare's best works, is rich in both theme and language, the kind of archetypal story that has been referenced ever since to describe the inordinately ambitious. Phrases like "the end all and be all" and "the sound and the fury" originate with this play; Macbeth's monologue following his wife's death is one of the most famous passages in English literature. But what may have impressed me most was Shakespeare's ability to set a mood—the whole play resonates with a sense of foreboding doom; without ever describing it, you can nevertheless feel the fog and the darkness that surrounds his play.

I read from was the Arden 3rd edition, which I learned at London's Globe Theatre is the definitive scholarly edition of all Shakespeare's works. Containing more than 150 pages of notes in the introduction and appendix in addition to hundreds of footnotes, I would certainly recommend this edition to any diehard reader of Shakespeare (for my part, I skimmed the introductory notes.) But whether you read from that edition or from a free one online, either way I recommend making sure this play doesn't slip through the cracks...it's one of Shakespeare's finest.


SHOELESS JOE by W.P. Kinsella

While the film Field of Dreams has a special place in my heart (I've seen it at least 10 times, and have cried every one of them), I'd never before made time to the read the novel it was based on. With Major League Baseball mired in a lockout, this was a good month to remedy that oversight.

Shoeless Joe tells the story of Ray Kinsella, an Iowa farmer who hears a mysterious voice command him to plow his cornfield and build a baseball stadium so that disgraced ballplayer Shoeless Joe Jackson will have a place to play. This turns out to be only the first of a series of mysterious commands, all of which culminate in baseball-oriented closure for a series of men, from Kinsella to Catcher in the Rye author J.D. Salinger to the oldest living Chicago Cub. It's a novel about fathers and sons, about dreams and faith, and about nostalgia and sentimentality.

And as it turns out, the movie is a pretty faithful rendering of the novel—a few characters were cut out, yes, and the studio was too nervous about lawsuits to use real-life figure J.D. Salinger (they opted for a proxy character, "Terrance Mann")—but in plot and tone, Shoeless Joe and Field of Dreams are of one piece. If you thought the movie was overly sentimental dreck, you're going to think the same thing about the book. If the movie touched your heart, the book will too.

It's not a flawless book by any means—the movie successfully tightened up a few areas where the book had too much fluff—but for those who like baseball and don't mind being romantic about it, Shoeless Joe is worth a read.

ESSENTIAL GHOST RIDER VOL. 4 by J.M. DeMatteis, Michael Fleischer, Bob Budiansky, Don Perlin, et al.

In the mid-to-late-1970s, Ghost Rider was an amalgam of several big trends of time: a little bit of horror here, a little bit of stunt biking there, a little bit of superhero adventure on the side. So when those trends became less trendy, what happened to Ghost Rider? It turns out that, after 80+ issues, the answer was to cancel the title, giving Johnny Blaze the happy ending he'd been seeking for years.

Essential Ghost Rider Vol. 4 rides out the end of that run in much the manner that the third third volume set up, with Johnny Blaze and the demon Zarathos (a.k.a. the Ghost Rider) in a Jekyll-Hyde, Bruce Banner-Hulk style relationship. With the former champion stunt biker now working for a traveling carnival, Blaze must fight day in and day out to restrain his demonic alter-ego, a struggle he inevitably loses around page 15 of each issue, just in time for Ghost Rider to tackle the villain of the day.

As that description indicates, it's pretty formulaic, but it's not badly written or drawn. And there are a few highlights in there, my favorite when Johnny mystically faces off against Zarathos for a motorcycle race through Hell. But by and large, this is the last gasp of a book that never quite figured out what it wanted to be beyond a marketer's idea of a good time. Ghost Rider would go on to be resurrected in the 1980s (with a new alter-ego, Danny Ketch) and then again in the 2010s. He would guest star in various cartoons and even get two Nicholas Cage movies. But he's never been more than a B-lister...and after 4 volumes of his original title, it's not hard to understand why.


FANTASTIC FOUR/IRON MAN: BIG TIME IN JAPAN by Zeb Wells and Seth Fisher

Well that was...weird.

Fantastic Four/Iron Man: Big Time in Japan is a 2005 four-issue miniseries that sees Marvel's First Family teaming up with the armored avenger for an all-out romp against a host of kaiju. Facing off against a few familiar monsters (and, eventually, the Mole Man), the heroes must come together to stave off the threat of an ancient "Apocalypse Beast."

But mostly, this series is artist Seth Fisher's excuse to go nuts with his surrealist, cartoony art, rendering the various kaiju in all sorts of strange ways, exploring what different dimensions look like on the comic page, and generally filling every page with color and madness. By the end of the book, I wasn't really reading the story so much as looking at the pretty pictures.

I don't know if this book is canon or not, and I'm not sure it really matters; it's an ultimately inconsequential story. But if you're somebody who likes comic art that strays off the beaten path, this is worth the hour it will take to read it. Don't expect much from the story and writing, but you'll have a ball with the art.

Understanding the Inexpressible (Friday Devotional

 


Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we ought, but that very Spirit intercedes with sighs too deep for words. And God, who searches the heart, knows what is the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.

- Romans 8:26-27

On Monday morning, I was privileged to participate in an online prayer meeting with Baptists around the world for peace and freedom in Ukraine. As ministers, seminary professors, denominational officials, and other leaders identified themselves and began praying one by one, I heard a number of different languages: English, Spanish, Romanian, and more. This meant, of course, that there were many prayers in which I didn’t understand the words being spoken.

But what struck me during that prayer meeting was how, even when I didn’t understand the words, I was able to identify what was being spoken as prayer to God. From their posture—heads bowed, eyes closed—to the cadence in which they spoke, it was clear that these fellow believers were coming before God in humility just like I was. Even when I couldn’t understand them, their prayers transcended words.

The Bible tells us that the Holy Spirit makes that possible for all of us in those moments when we can’t even understand our own prayers. When our needs are so deeply felt that we don’t know how to express them, the Spirit steps in for us and intercedes on our behalf, making intelligible what would otherwise seem meaningless “with sighs too deep for words.”

Words have tremendous power, but sometimes we can’t find the right ones. What an inexpressible gift then to know that God hears our hearts—even when we don’t understand ourselves.