
Whew. I read a lot of books this month.
It wasn't necessarily a goal I had, but this happened to be a month where, for a variety of reasons, I seemed to be reading all the time. So buckle up, it's a long one this go-round: 11 books (sort of...the Batman run at the end complicates that number) and more than 2,500 pages. Enjoy!
A WIND IN THE DOOR by Madeleine L'Engle
A SWIFTLY TILTING PLANET by Madeleine L'Engle
MANY WATERS by Madeleine L'Engle
AN ACCEPTABLE TIME by Madeleine L'Engle
This month I decided to dive headfirst into a YA classic series I never read as a kid, Madeleine L'Engle's science fiction-meets-spirituality Time Quintet. Simultaneously beloved and derided by Christians (it depends on how fundamentalist you are), these books tackle themes of love, sacrifice, and redemption, sometimes in an explicitly Christian way, while also being rollicking adventures.
A Wrinkle in Time, easily the most famous of the set, is the story of how Meg Murray, brother Charles Wallace, and friend Calvin O'Keefe travel through space and time to rescue Meg and Charles Wallace's father. A classic of the "love conquers all" archetype, this book has the best characters, the fastest pace, and the tidiest resolution of the series. Beloved for a reason.
A Wind in the Door has the same characters, this time traveling inside Charles Wallace's body to save him from a mysterious illness. The highlight of this one, however, is when the mean school principal, Mr. Jenkins, shows up—but is he really who he appears to be?
A Swiftly Tilting Planet turns the keys over to a now-teenaged Charles Wallace, who works with a unicorn to alter the past in order to prevent a coming nuclear apocalypse. This was probably the messiest of the five books and my least favorite, in no small part due to the absence of Meg, a more compelling protagonist than Charles Wallace.
Many Waters is the biggest outlier of the five and maybe my favorite, as it's basically just biblical fan fiction. It sees Meg and Charles Wallace's twin brothers, Sandy and Dennys, transported back in time to the day of Noah, as they interact with the patriarch's family, the glorious seraphim, and the sinister Nephilim. There's not a lot of plot to this one, but I enjoyed the setting enough that I was unbothered by that.
An Acceptable Time sees Meg and Calvin's daughter, Polly, transported back in time to an era when druids walked the earth. There she does her part to help heal her friend Zachary of a deadly illness before returning back to her own time.
All in all, these books are, to my mind, slightly overrated but still lovely stories for kids with a taste for sci-fi. Propulsive, clean, and fun, they're plot-heavy adventures with worthy themes and good writing. If you just read A Wrinkle in Time as a child and stopped there, you probably made the right decision, but you could do a lot worse than to spend a month reading the whole Time Quintet.
AMERICAN GOSPEL by Jon Meacham
In the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, we read that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," a clause which Thomas Jefferson famously described as setting up a "wall of separation" between the church and the state. One could assume from this principle—and subsequent Supreme Court decisions based upon it—that the United States is a secular nation.
Then you go to Washington D.C. and learn we have a National Cathedral. You look on our money and read, "In God we trust." You recite our Pledge of Allegiance and describe the country as "one nation under God." Where's that wall of separation, Jefferson?
In American Gospel, Jon Meacham addresses that inherent tension by offering a cursory history of America's relationship with public religion, from the Pilgrims to the dawn of the 21st century. A moderate in both his theology and his politics, Meacham is an advocate for the separation of church and state, but also repeatedly acknowledges that this is not a secular nation, but rather one in which the people have always cared deeply about religion and expected the same from their leaders.
For good and for ill, he essentially advocates for the kind of vague civil religion that Eisenhower once infamously said the nation needed: a "deeply felt religious faith, and I don't care what it is." Meacham's project is to show how religion used broadly has united the country and used narrowly has divided it, which history largely confirms.
For somebody who shares Meacham's moderate sensibilities but is also deeply committed to my own faith, I found myself nodding along with this book at times and finding it all a little too squishy at others. In the end, that's probably what Meacham would say is appropriate—faithful Americans ought to live in the tension of knowing their nation is religious without expecting any special treatment as a result. Put another way, America is not a Christian nation—but it is a religious one.
EVERY DAY I READ by Hwang Bo-Reum
Rule of thumb: when I see a book about reading, I pick it up. So when I spotted this one at a local independent bookstore, I immediately put it on hold at our local library.
Written by Hwang Bo-Reum, the Korean author of Welcome to the Hyunam-Dong Bookshop, Every Day I Read is a collection of 53 short (3-4 pages each) translated essays about the author's love of books. In a humble, approachable way, she writes about the universal love of reading that anyone who would pick up a book like this knows well.
Every Day I Read is best read an essay at a time; when I tried to read it in longer sittings, it got repetitive pretty quickly. But read as intended, it's a cozy celebration of books that may not break any new ground, but is a delight nonetheless.
HEARTSTOPPER VOL. 1-4 by Alice Oseman
In the state of Texas, when a parent complains about a book on the shelves of a public school library, a committee is formed to review the content of that book and determine whether it should be permanently removed from the library. Such committees are made up of district librarians, teachers, administrators, and community members in order to assure a diversity of viewpoints. This month, I was recruited to serve on such a committee in a review of the first four books in Alice Oseman's Heartstopper YA graphic novel series. These books were not my normal fare, but I was more than happy to do my part...reading as community service is kind of made for me!
Heartstopper is the story of the romance between two high school boys, Charlie Spring and Nick Nelson, from the moment they meet to Nick's coming out to them being in a committed relationship. It also addresses several issues particularly relevant to teenagers, including bullying, mental health, and eating disorders. Part soap opera, part coming-of-age story, and part PSA, it is a breezy series—I read all four books in a weekend without any trouble—for kids struggling with their identities (or even just for those looking for a queer romance story.) The art and writing style are both manga-adjacent, meant less to be lingered over than raced through.
Is it appropriate for teenagers in our public schools? I'll leave that decision to our committee and will use the rubric we've been given to make my own determination. But I will say this: one of the most beautiful things about books is their ability to make the reader feel less alone. And I have to think—whether it is checked out from the school library, the public library, or bought at Barnes & Noble—that Heartstopper has given comfort, encouragement, and even courage to some kids who feel like nobody understands them. For any institution that puts these books on its shelves, that's something worthy of consideration.
BATMAN by Tom King and Friends (David Finch, Mikel Janín, Clay Mann, et al.)
Few recent comics have been as polarizing as Tom King's 100 issues writing Batman from 2016-2022, a run which saw Batman nearly marry Catwoman, reestablished Bane as a formidable foe, and killed off faithful butler Alfred. Given free rein to tell his story his way, Tom King did so to such an extent that much of his run is no longer considered canon by fans, and the 12-issue maxiseries Batman & Catwoman which concluded that run is formally outside of DC continuity. In other words, lots of people hated it, and did so very vocally.
For my part, I loved about 90% of it.
King essentially has three projects in this book. The first is to humanize Batman, who is often portrayed in comics (and by fans) as a vigilante so competent and so devoted to justice that he seems more like a force of nature than a person. From the first issue, King gives us a Batman who hurts, has doubts, falls in love, and fails—a human being, in other words. This storytelling choice is arguably one of the biggest reasons so many comics fans despise this run, but it's one I think is worth standing by.
The second is to set up a long-term romance with Catwoman, which fans were led to believe (both in the story and by marketing) would culminate in a wedding in issue #50. Unfortunately—and it's not entirely clear whether this decision was King's, DC editorial's, or both—that much-hyped wedding ended with Bruce Wayne abandoned at the altar, a betrayal many readers never forgave. Nevertheless, their relationship is clearly the highlight of King's run, and unquestionably my favorite portrayal of Catwoman I've ever read.
The final overarching story is that of Bane seeking to "break the Bat" once again, this time mentally instead of physically. While the buildup is wonderful, the concluding story, "City of Bane," falls flat somewhat, managing to somehow drag and feel rushed at the same time. However, it does give fans a Bane they can respect, melding some of the gravitas of The Dark Knight Returns with the character's established history in the comics.
As is often the case with King's writing, some of the best parts of this run are single or double-issue stories, such as when Batman and Catwoman go on a double date with Superman and Lois Lane. The character work throughout the run is top-notch, and King has a Morrisonian knack for folding some of the silly parts of Batman's history into a modern story. Little moments, not sprawling stories, have always been King's forte, even as he likes to place them in the middle of huge melodramas.
Tom King's Batman is not a flawless book, and I can understand why fans longed for a "normal" Batman book after years of King's distinctive writing style. But for fans of the writer, this is absolutely worth checking out. Ignore the haters.